What fantasy player should i keep?
Asked: What fantasy player should i keep?
Hello everyone, I'm in a 14 team fantasy football (IDP) 5 keeper league.
Here are my keepers
Jake Cutler CHI (QB)
Gregg Jennings GB (WR)
Lesean McCoy PHI (RB)
Brandon Pettigrew DET (TE)
I don't know who to make my fifth keeper? Here are my options.
Julius Peppers CHI (DL)
James Laurianaitis STL (LB)
Lions DET (DST)
Who should i make my fifth keeper from these three players.I'm kinda leaning on going with Lions DST since there are only 32 DST to choose from and the Lions are ranked in the top 10. please help me make my decision a bit easier. Thanks
I agree I would keep the Lions (DST).
Never keep a team DEF.It doesn't matter if they're ranked in the top 10, because with DST, it all depends on matchups.There's no DST that is dominant enough to plug in every week.For example, I played the AZ Cardinals in a few games last season, and they were the top DEF a couple of times.
Anyway, it depends on league scoring, but LB's tend to be the most consistent scorers in IDP leagues.If yours is like this, stick with Laurinitis.
James Laurinitis.He's a tackling machine, and a potential top 5 LB.He's also young and could get better.Julius Peppers isn't a young guy anymoreand although consistent I don't see any monster years left for him.Detroit is a kind of risky team defense to begin with, but they're certainly no every week defense.Those are extraordinarily rare (Pittsburgh/Baltimore/SF)Are you prepared to start Detroit against Green Bay?
Kid, what you're trying to do here is
change centuries of definitions to
words in order to … well, make
yourself look foolish, I guess.
i think you're an atheist trying to make Christians look bad.go away.
Why do we call a bear a bear? Why do we call turtles turtles? Why do we call a daisy a daisy? These questions are meaningless. These are names we all simply give things. A tree is a tree because that is the term we use to describe large Woody perennial plants.
Let me ask you this…Do you enjoy nap time at school?
Wow this guy has a blown head fuse.
Wow! Talk about a lot of useless rambling. I'm guessing there is a point in there somewhere, but you seem very confused.
Some stuff is assumed but all the stuff you said about heat and the sun is proven by mathematics and observable evidence.
The bible is incorrect because it is a historical fact that it has been changed many, many times.
Even bible based religions can't agree on what it says.
If research religious history you will read the proof for yourself.
Even the bible canon was chosen based on one mans personal opinion.
That has to rank up in the top 10 most ignorant rants ever posted here.
There's no evidence any claimed god-thing exists, and lots of evidence to show all human-claimed god things do NOT exist.Therefore there's no reason to believe claims that they exist.
See how simple that was?
Now, please go get some education.
they have nothing BETTER THAN OUR PERFECT LORD!!!!!
Got a better answer? Share it below!